No Appraisal

StartFragmentThank you for this Ms Smith but if you read the post and scrutinize the words closely, it simply states the commonly held observation that Mr. Drilon looks exactly like Ms. Juana Change in the oft-chance (a possibility though unlikely) that he wears a ladies' wig - something that anybody (including Mr. Drilon's wife) is free to debunk and challenge anytime.

No judgment is rendered regarding his appearance or that of Ms. Paner (Change). Now, and we are sorry that we have to say this as a result of our response to your comment, things would be different had we called Mr. Drilon a hideous boar, an ugly swine of a porker for instance, which will now give full credence to your indictment that we are indeed mocking him and in effect Ms. Paner, since we have postulated the fact that the two look strikingly alike in physical terms.

Furthermore, you will notice that it is your comment that renders judgment on Mr. Drilon's and Ms. Paner's physical qualities since by implication, by suggesting that we are mocking him, you seem to draw this conclusion that Mr. Drilon is not a physically endowed man.

For how do you mock someone who is not facially challenged, say for example, if we compared Mr. Drilon to George Clooney or Kevin Costner?

Now this is no different from a previous post we made several weeks ago, when we openly shared our observation that Mr. Lagman looks like a fucking cannibal straight out of the exploitation movies.

There is no specific appraisal of Mr. Lagman's physical attributes, nor that of the cannibal we speak of. There was not even a reference to a specific movie title, only a genre.

Would you say the same if the cannibal we were comparing Mr. Lagman to was played by a fine-looking actor such as Brad Pitt? :)EndFragment