On Leverage Part 1
We could have simply let this pass, since giving too much attention to Barja and his cabal of amateur infiltrators seems like we're giving credence to their lies. But a recent post by a certain Ms. Bratikova (who apparently belongs to their clique), sent to us by a friend, seems like a rather valid point to address. Her accusation: WAC is positioning itself to becoming a powerful lobbying group.
Again you misread us.
When we said that we must organize for leverage, we never mentioned anything about lobbying. These people are just looking for loopholes in our intent.
When we said we have to organize a group that has the power to choose its own leaders, that pretty much says it all - to get rid of corrupt trapos through the collective power of the ballot.
An organized front - an assembly of people with a singular will to create a government free from corruption and political patronage with numerical superiority to beat powerful oligarchic structures - is what we aim to accomplish.
The majority does not lobby Ms. Bratikova. It decides.
Only the powerful few get to lobby.
Because what they lack in numbers, they make up for in terms of other things - money, gratuities, influence, intimidation, etc.
So you are totally missing the point here.
What we aim to do is to bring the power BACK to the people, where it rightfully belongs.
Right now, we do not have this power. It is claimed by the wealthy few who are keen on preserving the status quo.
We do not need numerical superiority to be able to lobby.
We only need money and enough influence to do that.
We are engineering the reclaiming of power in reverse. Not from top to bottom. But from the bottom up.
We are the exact antithesis of lobbying.
We are the powerful majority who decides.
Only idiots will not see the big difference between the two.
